2013년 11월 20일 수요일
Lamb
to the Slaughter and Human nature
My 3 year old cousin baby is a 3 year old.
Whenever she’s in a bad mood, you just have to tape the window and wait until
the hurricane pasts. I love her but she can be horrifying. If she wants
something, she’ll always get it, or else she’ll just beat people with her fat
fists yelling something like - “I want icecream!!!!!!!!” My uncle says that she’ll
kill people for meat in the ‘Snowpiercer’; that’s her. It’s not only my baby
cousin but every 3 year old, if you just look around, are such a ball of anger when
they want something. No humility, no decency, no nothing. They’ll use their
little violence or petty persistence to achieve what they want without any
moral conscience. I believe this anger 3 year olds express conveys the very
human nature Roald Dahl wanted to portrait; the anger human feel when they can’t
get their own way can results into extremely horrifying acts
It’s amusing why Roald Dahl particularly used ‘lamb’
meat for the setting. Lambs are symbol of innocence and purity. However, this
symbol of innocence and ‘sheepishness’; the lamb is used for killing Mary’s
husband. The lamb is the representation of Mary’s previously gentle personality
that she showed outward. At the start of the story, Mary seems so helpless and
even stupid because even though her husband is being such a trash, she keeps on
being a gentle wife by trying to make him dinner as if nothing has happened. It
was as if she was being led to the table for sacrificial victim of the marriage
like a lamb. By killing her husband with a lamb and cooking it to dispose it,
she has disposed of her own helpless sheepish personality and achieved what she
want by killing her husband. The violent dark side of human nature when they
can’t get what they want is drawn very clearly in the story when Mary kills her
husband crying “But you can’t go! You can’t! I won’t let you!”
Also, Dahl seems to write the dark side of
human nature especially in the form of impulsive revenge.
2013년 11월 19일 화요일
Picture of Dorian Gray Paragraph
At first glance, Oscar Wilde's "The Picture of Dorian Gray," might appear like another plain Faustian Tale where the main character falls into the devil's words.After all, when we first encounter Lord Henry and his beautiful words, we get the feeling that he's the one who corrupted Dorian. He was the one who awakened Dorian to his own beauty, and lured him to use his beauty for his own pleasure. However, as we continue to explore the book, we realize that there is no devil that makes his deal. The deal of youth just exists inside Dorian's portrait, which is supposedly a symbol for Dorian's desire for beauty, but later shows his most devilsh part. Therefore, it is perhaps more accurate to assume that, compared to the Bible, Lord Henry is merely a snake who lured Dorian into biting into an apple, and the true devil doesn't appear as a moving character like other Faustian tales, but more so a background image that's always there: the portrait. Realizing his beauty and using it for his benefit is surely a mishap; but the true devilish character was the boiling desire for beauty inside him, which is the ultimate reason for his madness that results in his suicide. In this sense, "The Picture of Dorian Gray" is different from other Faustian Tales because it shows that the true nature of the Devil is not the character outside, but has always existed inside oneself as insatiable desires.
피드 구독하기:
글 (Atom)